Reviews

To ensure that the journal has academic merit, the contributions undergo the process of double-blind review by external reviewers and/or members of the editorial board.

The reviews should address the following problems:

1. Is the subject addressed in this submission worthy of investigation?:

2. Is the content of the article consistent with its title?:

3. Evaluation of the structure, division of the content, validity of the theses, etc.:

4. Evaluation of the content and merit:

5. Does the article propose a new, original approach to a given problem? If so, to what extent?:

6. Evaluation of the choice and use of sources (are they relevant, up-to-date and complete?):

7. Evaluation of the formal aspects of the article (grammatical correctness, academic writing proficiency, etc.):

8. Would you recommend this article for publication?:

9. Other remarks and/or suggested corrections:

The blind review questionnaire may be downloaded here.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s